New Jersey Rules Of Professional Conduct

Table of Rules

NOTE: These rules shall be referred to as the Rules of Professional Conduct and shall be abbreviated as "RPC".

 RPC 1.0 Terminology

Note: Adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004. RPC 1.1 Competence

 1.1 Competence

A lawyer shall not:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 1.2. Scope of Representation and Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption amended, paragraphs (a) and (c) amended, and paragraph (e) deleted and redesignated as RPC 1.4(d) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.3. Diligence

A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 1.4. Communication

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; new paragraphs (a) and (d) adopted and former paragraphs (a) and (b) redesignated as paragraphs (b) and (c) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.5. Fees

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; new subparagraph (e)(2) added and former subparagraphs (e)(2) and (e)(3) redesignated as subparagraphs (e)(3) and (e)(4) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.6. Confidentiality of Information

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (a) and (b) amended, new paragraph (c) added, former paragraph (c) redesignated as paragraph (d), and former paragraph (d) amended and redesignated as paragraph (e) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; former subparagraph (d)(3) redesignated as subparagraph (d)(4) and new subparagraph (d)(3) adopted July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012.

 RPC 1.7. Conflict of Interest: General Rule

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; text deleted and new text adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.8. Conflict of Interest: Current Clients; Specific Rules

Note: Adopted September 10, 1984 to be effective immediately; paragraph (e) amended July 12, 2002 to be effective September 3, 2002; caption amended, paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (f), (g), (h) amended, former paragraph (i) deleted, former paragraph (j) redesignated as paragraph (i), former paragraph (k) deleted, and new paragraphs (j) , (k) and (l) added November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.9 Duties to Former Clients

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption amended, paragraphs (a) and (b) amended, and new paragraphs (c) and (d) added November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.10. Imputation of Conflicts of Interest: General Rule

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (b) corrected in Dewey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 109 N.J. 201, 217-18 (1988); caption and paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) amended, paragraph (d) deleted, former paragraph (e) amended and redesignated as paragraph (d), new paragraphs (e) and (f) adopted November 17, 2003

 RPC 1.11. Successive Government and Private Employment

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended, text of paragraph (b) deleted and new text adopted, new paragraph (c) adopted, former paragraphs (c) and (d) amended and redesignated as paragraphs (d) and (e), and former paragraph (e) merged into redesignated paragraph (e) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; paragraph (c) amended July 9, 2008 to be effective September 1, 2008.

Comment by Court (Regarding 2008 Amendment). In In re ACPE Opinion 705, 192 N.J. 46 (2007), the Court deferred to the Legislature in the spirit of comity and held that the post-government employment restrictions imposed by the New Jersey Conflicts of Interest Law, N.J.S.A. 52:13D-17, apply in the context of former State attorneys.  The 2008 amendment to paragraph (c) implements that decision.

 RPC 1.12. Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator or Other Third-Party Neutral or Law Clerk

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption and paragraph (a) amended, new paragraph (b) adopted, former paragraphs (b) and (c) amended and redesignated as paragraphs (c) and (d) November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.13. Organization as the Client

Note: Adopted September 10, 1984, to be effective immediately; amended June 28, 1996, to be effective September 1, 1996.

 RPC 1.14. Client Under a Disability

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (a) and (b) amended and new paragraph (c) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.15. Safekeeping Property

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 1.16. Declining or Terminating Representation

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; paragraph (d) amended March 25, 2013 to be effective April 1, 2013.

 RPC 1.17. Sale of Law Practice

A lawyer or law firm may sell or purchase a law practice, including good will, if the following conditions are satisfied:

Note: Adopted October 16, 1992, to be effective immediately; paragraph (f) amended July 10, 1998, to be effective September 1, 1998; paragraph (b) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 1.18. Prospective Client

Note: Adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.
$title = " RPC 2.1. Advisor"; include("includer.php"); ccheader($title); ccprebody(); ?>

 RPC 2.1. Advisor

In representing a client, a lawyer shall exercise independent professional judgment and render candid advice. In rendering advice, a lawyer may refer not only to law but to other considerations, such as moral, economic, social and political facts, that may be relevant to the client's situation.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.
$title = " RPC 2.2. (Reserved)"; include("includer.php"); ccheader($title); ccprebody(); ?>

 RPC 2.2. (Reserved)

Note: RPC 2.2 ("Intermediary") adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption and rule deleted November 17, 2003 effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 2.3. Evaluation for Use by Third Persons

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended and redesignated as paragraphs (a) and (b), former paragraph (b) redesignated as paragraph (d), and paragraph (c) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 2.4. Lawyer Serving as Third-Party Neutral

Note: Adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 3.1. Meritorious Claims and Contentions

A lawyer shall not bring or defend a proceeding, nor assert or controvert an issue therein unless the lawyer knows or reasonably believes that there is a basis in law and fact for doing so that is not frivolous, which includes a good faith argument for an extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, or the establishment of new law. A lawyer for the defendant in a criminal proceeding, or the respondent in a proceeding that could result in incarceration, may nevertheless so defend the proceeding as to require that every element of the case be established.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 3.2. Expediting Litigation

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the interests of the client and shall treat with courtesy and consideration all persons involved in the legal process.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 3.3. Candor Toward the Tribunal

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 3.4. Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel

A lawyer shall not:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (g) adopted July 18, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990.

 RPC 3.5. Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal

A lawyer shall not:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (b) and (c) amended and new paragraph (d) adopted July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012.

 RPC 3.6. Trial Publicity

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (b)(1) amended October 1, 1992, to be effective immediately; paragraph (a) amended, paragraph (b) deleted and restated in Official Comment, paragraph (c) amended and redesignated as paragraph (b), and new paragraph (c) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

Official Comment by Supreme Court (November 17, 2003)

A statement referred to in paragraph (a) ordinarily is likely to have such an effect when it refers to a civil matter triable to a jury, a criminal matter, or any other proceeding that could result in incarceration, and the statement relates to:

 RPC 3.7. Lawyer as Witness

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 3.8. Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor

The prosecutor in a criminal case shall:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (c) and (d) amended and new paragraphs (e) and (f) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 3.9. Advocate in Nonadjudicative Proceedings

A lawyer representing a client before a legislative body or administrative tribunal in a nonadjudicative proceeding shall disclose that the appearance is in a representative capacity and shall conform to the provisions of RPC 3.3(a) through (d), RPC 3.4(a) through (g), and RPC 3.5(a) through (c).

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 4.1. Truthfulness in Statements to Others

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 4.2. Communication with Person Represented by Counsel

In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a person the lawyer knows, or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should know, to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, including members of an organization's litigation control group as defined by RPC 1.13, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer, or is authorized by law or court order to do so, or unless the sole purpose of the communication is to ascertain whether the person is in fact represented. Reasonable diligence shall include, but not be limited to, a specific inquiry of the person as to whether that person is represented by counsel. Nothing in this rule shall, however, preclude a lawyer from counseling or representing a member or former member of an organization's litigation control group who seeks independent legal advice.

Note: Adopted September 10, 1984, to be effective immediately; amended June 28, 1996, to be effective September 1, 1996; amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

Official Comment by Supreme Court (November 17, 2003)

Concerning organizations, RPC 4.2 addresses the issue of who is represented under the rule by precluding a lawyer from communicating with members of the organization's litigation control group. The term "litigation control group" is not intended to limit application of the rule to matters in litigation. As the Report of the Special Committee on RPC 4.2 states, "... the 'matter' has been defined as a 'matter whether or not in litigation.'" The primary determinant of membership in the litigation control group is the person's role in determining the organization's legal position. See Michaels v. Woodland, 988 F.Supp. 468, 472 (D.N.J. 1997).

In the criminal context, the rule ordinarily applies only after adversarial proceedings have begun by arrest, complaint, or indictment on the charges that are the subject of the communication. See State v. Bisaccia, 319 N.J. Super. 1, 22-23 (App. Div. 1999).

Concerning communication with governmental officials, the New Jersey Supreme Court Commission on the Rules of Professional Conduct agrees with the American Bar Association's Commission comments, which state:

Communications authorized by law may include communications by a lawyer on behalf of a client who is exercising a constitutional or other legal right to communicate with a governmental official. For example, the constitutional right to petition and the public policy of ensuring a citizen's right of access to government decision makers, may permit a lawyer representing a private party in a controversy with the government to communicate about the matter with government officials who have authority to take or recommend action in the matter.

 RPC 4.3. Dealing with Unrepresented Person; Employee of Organization

In dealing on behalf of a client with a person who is not represented by counsel, a lawyer shall not state or imply that the lawyer is disinterested. When the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the unrepresented person misunderstands the lawyer's role in the matter, the lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to correct the misunderstanding. If the person is a director, officer, employee, member, shareholder or other constituent of an organization concerned with the subject of the lawyer's representation but not a person defined by RPC 1.13(a), the lawyer shall also ascertain by reasonable diligence whether the person is actually represented by the organization's attorney pursuant to RPC 1.13(e) or who has a right to such representation on request, and, if the person is not so represented or entitled to representation, the lawyer shall make known to the person that insofar as the lawyer understands, the person is not being represented by the organization's attorney.

Note: Adopted September 10, 1984, to be effective immediately; amended June 28, 1996, to be effective September 1, 1996.

 RPC 4.4. Respect for Rights of Third Persons

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; text redesignated as paragraph (a) and new paragraph (b) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 5.1. Responsibilities of Partners, Supervisory Lawyers, and Law Firms

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption and paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; new paragraph (d) adopted July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012.

 RPC 5.2. Responsibilities of a Subordinate Lawyer

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 5.3. Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants

With respect to a nonlawyer employed or retained by or associated with a lawyer:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 5.4. Professional Independence of a Lawyer

Except as otherwise provided by the Rules of Court:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a)(2) amended and paragraph (a)(3) adopted October 16, 1992, to be effective immediately; paragraph (d) amended July 10, 1998, to be effective September 1, 1998; paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 5.5 Lawyers Not Admitted to the Bar of This State and the Lawful Practice of Law

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption amended, former text designated as paragraph (a), and new paragraphs (b) and (c) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; paragraph (c) amended July 28, 2004 to be effective September 1, 2004; subparagraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (b)(3)(iii) amended, former subparagraph (b)(3)(iv) redesignated as subparagraph (b)(3)(v) and amended, new subparagraph (b)(3)(iv) adopted, and paragraph (c) and subparagraphs (c)(3) and (c)(6) amended July 23, 2010 to be effective September 1, 2010; subparagraph (b)(3)(iv) amended July 19, 2012 to be effective September 4, 2012.

Official Comment by Supreme Court (November 17, 2003)

Three years from the January 1, 2004 effective date of the amendments to RPC 5.5, the Supreme Court will have its Professional Responsibility Rules Committee undertake a comprehensive evaluation of the experience gained in multijurisdictional practice to determine whether any modifications to the RPC 5.5 amendments as adopted are necessary or desirable.

 RPC 5.6. Restrictions on Right to Practice

A lawyer shall not participate in offering or making:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 6.1. Voluntary Public Interest Legal Service

Every lawyer has a professional responsibility to render public interest legal service. A lawyer may discharge this responsibility by providing professional services at no fee or a reduced fee to persons of limited means or to public service or charitable groups or organizations, by service in activities for improving the law, the legal system or the legal profession, and by financial support for organizations that provide legal services to persons of limited means.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption and text amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 6.2. Accepting Appointments

A lawyer shall not seek to avoid appointment by a tribunal to represent a person except for good cause, such as:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 6.3. Membership in Legal Services Organization

A lawyer may serve as a director, officer or member of a legal services organization, other than the law firm with which the lawyer practices, notwithstanding that the organization serves persons having interests adverse to a client of the lawyer if:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 6.4. Law Reform Activities Affecting Client Interests

A lawyer may serve as a director, officer or member of an organization involved in reform of the law or its administration notwithstanding that the reform may affect the interests of a client of the lawyer. When the lawyer knows that the interests of a client may be materially benefited by a decision in which the lawyer participates, the lawyer shall disclose that fact but need not identify the client, except that when the organization is also a legal services organization, RPC 6.3 shall apply.

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 6.5. Nonprofit and Court-Annexed Limited Legal Service Programs

Note: Adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 7.1. Communications Concerning a Lawyer's Service

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; new paragraph (b) added June 26, 1987, to be effective July 1, 1987; paragraph (a) amended June 29, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990; paragraph (b) amended January 5, 2009 to be effective immediately; paragraph (a)(3) amended and Official Comment adopted November 2, 2009 to be effective immediately.

 RPC 7.2. Advertising

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (a) amended December 10, 1986, to be effective December 10, 1986; paragraph (c) amended October 16, 1992, to be effective immediately; paragraph (a) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 7.3. Personal Contact with Prospective Clients

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (b)(4) amended June 29, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990; new paragraph (b)(4) adopted and former paragraph (b)(4) redesignated and amended as paragraph (b)(5) April 28, 1997, to be effective May 5, 1997; paragraph (b)(5) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004; subparagraph (b)(5)(i) amended July 23, 2010 to be effective September 1, 2010.

 RPC 7.4. Communication of Fields of Practice and Certification

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; former rule amended and designated paragraph (a) and new paragraph (b) adopted July 15, 1993, to be effective September 1, 1993; paragraph (a) amended, paragraph (b) redesignated as paragraph (d), and new paragraphs (b) and (c) adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 7.5. Firm Names and Letterheads

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraphs (a) and (d) amended, paragraph (e) amended and redesignated as paragraph (f) and new paragraph (e) added June 29, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990; paragraph (a) amended January 5, 2009 to be effective immediately.

 RPC 8.1. Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters

An applicant for admission to the bar, or a lawyer in connection with a bar admission application or in connection with a disciplinary matter, shall not:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 8.2. Judicial and Legal Officials

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984.

 RPC 8.3. Reporting Professional Misconduct

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; new paragraph (d) adopted October 5, 1993, to be effective immediately; paragraphs (a) and (b) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

 RPC 8.4. Misconduct

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984, to be effective September 10, 1984; paragraph (g) adopted July 18, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990; paragraph (g) amended May 3, 1994, to be effective September 1, 1994; paragraph (e) amended November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

Official Comment by Supreme Court (May 3, 1994)

This rule amendment (the addition of paragraph g) is intended to make discriminatory conduct unethical when engaged in by lawyers in their professional capacity. It would, for example, cover activities in the court house, such as a lawyer's treatment of court support staff, as well as conduct more directly related to litigation; activities related to practice outside of the court house, whether or not related to litigation, such as treatment of other attorneys and their staff; bar association and similar activities; and activities in the lawyer's office and firm. Except to the extent that they are closely related to the foregoing, purely private activities are not intended to be covered by this rule amendment, although they may possibly constitute a violation of some other ethical rule. Nor is employment discrimination in hiring, firing, promotion, or partnership status intended to be covered unless it has resulted in either an agency or judicial determination of discriminatory conduct. The Supreme Court believes that existing agencies and courts are better able to deal with such matters, that the disciplinary resources required to investigate and prosecute discrimination in the employment area would be disproportionate to the benefits to the system given remedies available elsewhere, and that limiting ethics proceedings in this area to cases where there has been an adjudication represents a practical resolution of conflicting needs.

"Discrimination" is intended to be construed broadly. It includes sexual harassment, derogatory or demeaning language, and, generally, any conduct towards the named groups that is both harmful and discriminatory.

Case law has already suggested both the area covered by this amendment and the possible direction of future cases. In re Vincenti, 114 N.J. 275 (554 A.2d 470) (1989). The Court believes the administration of justice would be better served, however, by the adoption of this general rule than by a case by case development of the scope of the professional obligation.

While the origin of this rule was a recommendation of the Supreme Court's Task Force on Women in the Courts, the Court concluded that the protection, limited to women and minorities in that recommendation, should be expanded. The groups covered in the initial proposed amendment to the rule are the same as those named in Canon 3A(4) of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

Following the initial publication of this proposed subsection (g) and receipt of various comments and suggestions, the Court revised the proposed amendment by making explicit its intent to limit the rule to conduct by attorneys in a professional capacity, to exclude employment discrimination unless adjudicated, to restrict the scope to conduct intended or likely to cause harm, and to include discrimination because of sexual orientation or socioeconomic status, these categories having been proposed by the ABA's Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility as additions to the groups now covered in Canon 3A(4) of the New Jersey Code of Judicial Conduct. That Committee has also proposed that judges require attorneys, in proceedings before a judge, refrain from manifesting by words or conduct any bias or prejudice based on any of these categories. See proposed Canon 3A(6). This revision to the RPC further reflects the Court's intent to cover all discrimination where the attorney intends to cause harm such as inflicting emotional distress or obtaining a tactical advantage and not to cover instances when no harm is intended unless its occurrence is likely regardless of intent, e.g., where discriminatory comments or behavior is repetitive. While obviously the language of the rule cannot explicitly cover every instance of possible discriminatory conduct, the Court believes that, along with existing case law, it sufficiently narrows the breadth of the rule to avoid any suggestion that it is overly broad. See, e.g., In re Vincenti, 114 N.J. 275 (554 A.2d 470) (1989).

 RPC 8.5. Disciplinary Authority; Choice of Law

Note: Adopted July 12, 1984 to be effective September 10, 1984; caption amended, text amended and redesignated as paragraph (a) with caption added, new paragraph (b) with caption adopted November 17, 2003 to be effective January 1, 2004.

Attorney Advertising Guidelines (As approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey)

Attorney Advertising Guideline 1

In any advertisement by an attorney or law firm, the advertisement shall include the bona fide street address of the attorney or law firm.

Note: Adopted June 29, 1990, to be effective September 4, 1990.

Attorney Advertising Guideline 2

Note: Adopted March 2, 2005, to be effective immediately.

Commentary: The language in (c) is derived, in part, from CAA Opinion 20, published June 10, 1996. Section (c) excludes the Opinion 20 requirement that the notices under RPC 7.3(b)(5)(ii and iii) be printed on the envelope.

Attorney Advertising Guideline 3

Attorney Advertisements: Use of Quotations or Excerpts From Judicial Opinions About the Legal Abilities of an Attorney

An attorney or law firm may not include, on a website or other advertisement, a quotation or excerpt from a court opinion (oral or written) about the attorney’s abilities or legal services. An attorney may, however, present the full text of opinions, including those that discuss the attorney’s legal abilities, on a website or other advertisement.

Official Comment to Guideline 3 (by the Supreme Court)

This Guideline arises from the review by the Committee on Attorney Advertising of an attorney’s website that included two quotations from judges about the attorney’s legal abilities. The quotations were from unpublished opinions of the judges on fee applications and the judges’ names and titles were included in the advertisement.

RPC7.1(a) prohibits misleading statements. When a judge discusses an attorney’s legal abilities in an opinion, such as in a fee-shifting or division-of-fee case, the judge is setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law pertinent to the decision in the matter. The judge is not personally endorsing the attorney or making a public statement about the attorney for advertising purposes. In fact, judges are expressly prohibited from endorsing attorneys or providing testimonials regarding attorneys. The Committee finds that such quotations or excerpts, when taken out of the context of the judicial opinion and used by an attorney for the purpose of soliciting clients, are prohibited judicial endorsements or testimonials. As such, these quotations or excerpts from a judicial opinion in attorney advertising are inherently misleading in violation of RPC 7.1(a).

Note: Adopted May 15, 2012 to be effective June 1, 2012.